Evelyn Nissirios — Michael Antoniewicz — Jane Gallina-Mecca

The ‘Job’ of Family Court Team Cover-Up is Not Justice, but Covering for Violent Perpetrator and Child Kidnapper, Alan T. Chan

To run a brutal child trafficking operation as do the Family Courts, in connection with the most unspeakable exploitation of children — such as pedophilic sex rings and child pornography production — by some of the most powerful members of society — such as Family Court judges who exploit the law instead of upholding it to conceal serial felonies that may warrant the electric chair in some states — the criminals must cover for one another to prevent exposure. Secrecy is all they have, which they clearly know (in addition to perpetrators like Alan T. Chan, who would help them with his life, since without them he would be prosecuted for felonies, also). This is what the child predator and violent perpetrator Evelyn Nissirios’ “protective order” is all about. This is why she cannot file for a defamation lawsuit, as long as I am absolutely waiting for the moment when the truth is revealed in discovery!

Jane Gallina-Mecca has persisted in her criminal enterprise long enough, relying solely on the presumption of legality, since this is what the public assumes when “orders” are issued out of a “court”. People need to become aware that, when courts “seal” their records, presumably “for the protection of children,” there is no protection against their committing the most unspeakable, unconscionable exploitation of children — and, astonishingly, this is what happens the vast majority of the time, at least in my experience of Family Court. Of the more than fifty Family Court cases in which I have served as an expert witness, all across the country, which involves looking at all the evidence and evaluating the players firsthand, 98 percent of the children have been deliberately sent to the worst kind of torture and “soul death” one could inflict on a child — to separate them from the loving parent and to traffic them to their abusers, who in turn traffic them to pedophilic sex rings, child pornography production, murder, and suicide — all against evidence and against the Law.

This is why First-Amendment Free Speech is immensely important, about which I speak more in my recent podcast with Maryann Petri.

Here is my statement to Judge Michael Antoniewicz, who refused to recuse himself, despite having been federally sued for weaponizing a “protective order” to violate First-Amendment Free Speech:

BANDY LEE STATEMENT

In accordance with New Jersey Court Rule 1:12–1, Canon 3(C) of the New Jersey Code of Judicial Conduct, relevant Case Law, and the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment, I respectfully move this Court to recuse itself from further involvement in this matter, due to concerns that Judge Michael Antoniewicz has engaged in retaliatory actions in violation of Defendant’s rights to a fair and impartial trial under the law, and to change venue outside of Bergen County Family Court, to remove all sources of retaliatory bias.

I have two arguments: One is that any first-year law student would know that Your Honor’s taking on this case in the first place, based on your prior working relationship with Plaintiff Evelyn Nissirios, would by definition disqualify you. Even if you semantically obfuscated and contorted your past working relationship with her, an undeniable conflict of interest is present in your future potential working relationship with her, where she is the favored guardian ad litem in the same court, as well as the firm she is part of, which is representing her today, which also does regular business with this Family Court.

At the very least, your presiding judge, Jane Gallina-Mecca, has been doing everything possible to protect Plaintiff Nissirios, meddling and illegally extending her authority in every other court and outside agency to protect her, including removing criminal indictments against her — as she has done in at least two other cases where her collaborators were criminally charged — it is a given that you cannot go against your presiding judge.

Second, you have not acted as if this were a court of law. You should know that one of the first principles of the U.S. Constitution is that you do not trample on First Amendment rights. No court of law has ever found any of my postings defamatory or otherwise unlawful. Yet, you have enforced a prior restraint on my First-Amendment Free Speech rights for nine months and ongoing, when you granted Plaintiff Nissirios’ frivolous and fraudulent “protective order.” When I warned Your Honor that Plaintiff Nissirios is a pathological liar, as confirmed across dozens of cases and by her own colleagues, you insisted on the presumption of her telling the truth, on the basis that even her blatant, habitual perjury has not yet been confirmed in a court of law. Why does the same argument not apply to me? Why is my speech presumptively unprotected, when no court of law has determined that this is so? In this fact alone, Your Honor has demonstrated incontrovertible bias.

You know that no fully-informed, reasonable person would ever interpret public articles criticizing a court and its actors as being anything other than protected speech. Indeed, it is the very reason the First Amendment was established in the first place. And no reasonable person would view that your acting in cooperation with Plaintiff Nissirios to grant a temporary protective order that has no possibility whatsoever of being successful in any other, non-corrupt setting as being valid, on its face….

You may, like Judge Jane Gallina-Mecca, still believe you are non-retaliatory, when your very presence in this matter is as an agent of retaliation for Judge Gallina-Mecca. Indeed, you may or may not know this, but you have been essentially functioning as her enforcement agency of mob rule.

After five years, of abuses in the Family Court of Judge Gallina-Mecca, the judge has disabled my sister to the point of her now having total physical disability and needing round-the-clock care. She almost died nine times because of Judge Gallina-Mecca’s unconscionable, sadistic, retaliatory enabling of her homicidal ex-husband — by advancing false, fictitious narratives that Plaintiff Nissirios supported, suppressing volumes of incriminating evidence against her ex-husband, Alan T. Chan. This resulted in giving the custody of two children to a violent, womanizing, substance-abusing, and pornography-addicted psychopath, duly-diagnosed by four world-renowned forensic experts who warned that he was a danger to his children and unfit to parent. And yet, despite the overwhelming evidence attesting to her bias and prejudice — Judge Gallina-Mecca still has not recused herself.

Sometimes the most retaliatory individuals are the least likely to admit that they are retaliatory. I can attest to and confirm this, based on my research findings as a specialist who has worked for twenty-five years with violent offenders — as well as authored an authoritative text on violence, used in universities worldwide.

I was introduced to Family Courts because of the unconscionable abuse my sister suffered in this so-called “Court” during the last five years. What I quickly learned is that Family Courts are “courts” in name only, since they are entirely untethered from the Law, do not respect the principle of open courts — indeed, almost universally “seal” their records like a Star Chamber — and commit unspeakable crimes from within — such as literally kidnapping children from competent parents and sending them to a life of torture and often death — crimes that would incur the death penalty in some states…. How can this happen? Secrecy and impunity — the very challenge of which is the cause of my being on trial today.

The standard practice of Family courts protecting themselves from judicial accountability and scrutiny by means of draconian “court seals” is the greatest argument for having open courts. Our Founders established open courts so that the people, whom courts are supposed to serve, can have oversight as to whether public servants are serving the public interest or merely their own hidden agendas. Never did I imagine that total secrecy would mean that courts would engage in massive child abuse, becoming the cause of thousands of child murders and murders of the parents who love them — all designed to protect and insulate them from public scrutiny and accountability. I have come to call Family Court practices as “the greatest human rights violations on U.S. soil.”

How tragic that these unconscionable miscarriages of justice are taking place in the Family Courts? This is where families come to try to resolve family violence. Instead of protecting victims of violence, Family Courts more times than not exploit them, “frame” them, and “exonerate” the real criminals, in a practice of “reversing victim and offender,” because this practice brings in more business and is profitable.

Never could I have imagined the unfathomable irony that Family Courts would be the enablers and coddlers of violent criminals by intentionally and proactively colluding with them against innocent, vulnerable members of society — especially women and children. Covering up these heinous practices, of which Plaintiff Nissirios epitomizes, is the true purpose of her frivolous and fictitious “protective order,” so that she will not be exposed and will be able to continue with her predatory exploitation of children, her fictitious narratives that the fit parent is the unfit one and the dangerous parent the fit one, and relentless character assassinations and psychological assaults on witnesses of her crimes. This is what we are truly speaking of.

There are numerous instances where Plaintiff Nissirios transferred children to their torture, battery, pedophilic sex trafficking, and Satanic cults — which unsurprisingly led to suicide attempts, attempted murder, and multiple brushes with death, as has happened to my own sister. Why is she doing this? Because she can. She has operated under total secrecy, with the unconscionable, illegal abuse of power, through her collaboration with Judge Gallina-Mecca, to falsely arrest, intimidate, and character assassinate anyone who would tell the truth about her. She was not able to do so to me, since I was not a litigant in any court case she controlled. This is why she filed for a bogus “protective order” against me, even though, [if this resembled anything of a real system of justice, dozens of protective orders would be issued against her for actual kidnapping and attempted murder, as has happened in my sister’s case, in her co-conspiracy with Alan T. Chan to kill her].

Her arrogance from her total impunity so far is deluded and extreme, to the point where she experiences someone telling the truth about her as “harassment” and “stalking”! No reasonable, fully-informed rational person would see it that way. Instead, they would see that it is her mental sickness, swollen from impunity. Support of court actors like her is the reason I call Family Courts an “abuse industry,” and this is why you are trying to silence me, for telling the truth and jeopardizing your profitable business….

At the very least, your presiding judge, the soon-to-be-impeached Jane Gallina-Mecca, has been doing everything possible to protect Plaintiff Nissirios, and it is a given that you are unable to go against your superior, presiding judge — who obviously directed you to do her bidding. This is why you must recuse yourself and change venue to a court far from the extensive reaches of Judge Gallina-Mecca.

*There is now tremendous momentum to impeach Judge Jane Gallina-Mecca, and the nation is watching! Please sign if you have not done so, and help us to reform the egregiously violent Family Courts!